The same is the second break, the obvious difference between the counter break and the cone break is the difference between the crushing principle and the appearance structure, which is easy to distinguish. Impact breaking adopts the principle of impact crushing, the material is broken by repeated impact between the plate hammer and the impact plate, and the cone breaking adopts lamination crushing, and the rolled mortar wall constantly moves to the crushing wall to squeeze the material sandwiched between the two to crush it.
There are also many differences between the two in actual production, as follows:
1. Different scope of application
Counter break and cone break can act as a secondary crushing equipment, but the hardness of the materials broken by the two is not the same. In general, the cone break mainly breaks some materials with greater hardness, such as granite, basalt, tuff, river pebbles, etc., and the counterattack break is used to break materials with smaller hardness, such as limestone, limestone, etc.
In a word, the counter break is suitable for small and brittle materials with hardness and below in the crushing, and the cone break is suitable for crushing hard materials.
2, discharge particle size is different
The discharge particle size of the materials broken by the two kinds of crusher equipment is also different. In general, the cone break is finer than the counter-broken material. In actual production, more cone breaks are used in mineral processing, and more counter breaks are used in building materials and construction projects.
3, the finished grain type is different
The grain shape of the counterattack is good, the finished product has less corners and more powder; In the finished conical broken products, there are many needle flakes and poor grain shape.
4, processing capacity is different
Compared with counterattack breaking, cone breaking has the characteristics of low energy consumption, large output and stable production, so cone breaking is often used in large-scale production line operations with high output.
5, the input cost is different
The price of the cone break is more expensive than the counter break, but its wearing parts have a longer life, avoiding the trouble of frequent replacement parts, and the cone break is more cost-effective than the counter break in the long run.
It can be understood that the early purchase cost of counterattack is low, and the later maintenance cost is high; The initial cost of cone breaking is high, and the later input cost is low.
6. Different levels of pollution
The noise pollution and dust pollution of the counterattack are large; Cone breakage is less polluting.
In summary, the counterattack and cone break each have their own advantages and disadvantages, in the actual production to choose which equipment, but also need to be selected according to different materials, input and input particle size, output and other aspects. Here it is recommended that if it is a small stone production line, the use of counter breaking on the line, if it is a large stone production line and the material is hard, the choice of cone breaking will be better, if the grain type requirements are very strict, you can add a shaping machine.
Post time: Apr-09-2025